Greeley Reflections
Accreditation Connection, June 22, 2009
Time to start working on restraint
Part 1 of 3:
Before tracers came along, restraint was just about the most frequently cited requirement for improvement (formerly “Type 1” recommendation). We have a hunch restraint citations may be coming back to the top 10.
First, The Joint Commission just made significant changes to the restraint standards to more closely align with the CMS Conditions of Participation. We expect extensive surveyor training with a corresponding renewal of focus on this subject.
Second, CMS (or, more correctly, the state agency representing CMS in your neighborhood) tends to focus on restraint during its validation surveys, typically asking for a sample of recent restraint/seclusion records. Although this is not the Joint Commission’s current survey process (surveyors only review restraint records if they happen to choose a restrained patient during a tracer), with the Joint Commission’s deemed status up for renewal, there may well be a more focused approach on future surveys.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: New device pass-through categories
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- CEO admits to significant problems to handling discovery of child pornography
- Sneak Peek: Planning for homecare can reduce avoidable readmissions
- E-mailed
-
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Know the common bunionectomy procedure codes and how to use them
- Code changes should help ease the pain when coding for facet joint injections
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Featured blog post: Implementation of NPDB’s Section 1921
- Medication safety group revises its list of high-risk medications
- Investigate gray areas to improve patient status assignment
- Interview exiting employeesto stop would-be whistleblowers in their tracks
- HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA-compliant phone messages
- Searched
