A look at Joint Commission scoring 101
Briefings on The Joint Commission, February 1, 2009
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
No more B EPs
Let’s look at the basics. The first question you must ask yourself is, “Which type of a standard am I looking at?”
B EPs are gone. Put supplemental findings out of your head. We are now dealing only with A and C EPs.
The A EPs can be broken down as structural requirements (e.g., policies or plans) or they may address an issue even though it focuses on performance or outcomes (e.g., the National Patient Safety Goals). A EPs are there or they’re not. There’s no middle ground. They are scored as 0 or 2.
C EPs are frequency-based, with hospitals scored between 0 and 2 depending on occurrences. C EPs are broken down by the following:
- One or no occurrences of noncompliance. The hospitals receives a score of 2.
- Two occurrences of noncompliance. The hospital receives a score of 1.
- Three or more occurrences of noncompliance. The hospital receives a score of 0.
Note: Even though a C element might be scored as 1, the standard will still be scored as 0. In 2008, any EP scored as 1 results in a standard score of 2, whereas in 2009, any EP score of 1 results in a standard score of 0.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Comments
0 comments on “A look at Joint Commission scoring 101 ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Note: Clarification of reference (non-patient) laboratory testing
- Get the facts on coding for non-biodegradeable drug delivery implants
- Facility E/M Levels, 2009 OPPS
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched
