LD.03.01.01: Leadership evaluation of culture of safety
Accreditation Connection, January 23, 2009
Q. The new leadership standard LD.03.01.01 says leaders regularly evaluate the culture of safety and quality using valid and reliable tools. If we are due for survey in 2009, when must we complete our first evaluation, and what does The Joint Commission mean by the term “regularly”? Also, how do you determine whether a tool is valid and reliable?
A. The standard becomes effective January 1, 2009; therefore, using the usual Joint Commission practice for evaluating track records, you would need to accomplish your first evaluation sometime after the effective date on January 1, 2009.
Normally, The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) publishes a new standard, you learn about it, you develop the necessary implementation effort, and the official start date against which you are evaluated is the effective date.
For example, if a new standard starts January 1, 2009, and you are surveyed in May 2009, you would have four-plus months of track records for the new standard. However, I recently received an e-mail from a hospital that had asked this same question of The Joint Commission’s Standards Interpretation Group, and its official response was that the first evaluation should be completed by January 2009.
Access the full story in the January issue of Briefings on The Joint Commission. Access is free for BOJ subscribers; nonsubscribers can purchase a copy of the story for $10 by clicking here.
Comments
0 comments on “LD.03.01.01: Leadership evaluation of culture of safety ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Note: Clarification of reference (non-patient) laboratory testing
- Get the facts on coding for non-biodegradeable drug delivery implants
- Facility E/M Levels, 2009 OPPS
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched
