Inconsistency exists in adverse event reporting
Accreditation Connection, December 11, 2008
A new study shows that although 94% of U.S. hospitals have centralized systems for gathering reports of adverse events, a scant 21% actually distribute and consider adverse event summary reports, Medical News Today reports.
The study, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, found that only 32% of hospitals have developed environments supportive of anonymous reporting of adverse events. Ninety-six percent of these events were reported by the nursing staff, while only 13% of the facilities surveyed have involvement across the board from staffers in reporting adverse events.
For more information on this study, click here.
Comments
0 comments on “Inconsistency exists in adverse event reporting ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding for telescopic intraocular lens
- Q/A: Correct use of modifier -PT
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- "Wall fountains" may be spreading Legionnaires to patients, visitors
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Searched
