Immediate-threat-to-life situations in 2009
Accreditation Connection, November 26, 2008
With the introduction of Life Safety Code® (LSC) surveyors to The Joint Commission’s survey process, the opportunity for hospitals to find themselves in preliminary denial of accreditation due to an immediate-threat-to-life situation—a situation so problematic that the lives or health of patients are immediately endangered—increased this year.
Scoring and other upcoming changes as of January 1, 2009, add to hospitals’ concerns about receiving a preliminary denial of accreditation.
Larry Poniatowski, RN, BSN, CSHA, principal consultant of accreditation compliance services at University HealthCare Consortium in Oak Brook, IL, notes key areas in addition to Environment of Care (EOC) standards in which the potential for confusion is cause for concern about immediate-threat-to-life situations.
Access the full story in the December issue of Briefings on The Joint Commission. Access is free for BOJ subscribers; nonsubscribers can purchase a copy of the story for $10 by clicking here.
Comments
0 comments on “Immediate-threat-to-life situations in 2009 ”
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership breaks down the Joint Commission’s leadership requirements into easy-to-understand...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement breaks down The Joint Commission’s performance improvement...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to the Medical Staff
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Medical Staff breaks down the Joint Commission’s medical staff requirements into...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Note: Clarification of reference (non-patient) laboratory testing
- Get the facts on coding for non-biodegradeable drug delivery implants
- Facility E/M Levels, 2009 OPPS
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched