Universal Protocol: Clarifying the physician’s role
Accreditation Connection, March 13, 2008
Q: According to the Universal Protocol for preventing wrong-site surgery, who is required to do the site marking? We are hearing that The Joint Commission states it must be the surgeon.
A: In the Universal Protocol, Requirement 1B, EP 6, it states that the person performing the procedure "should" do the site marking. A subtle shift in defining the word "should" was noted in 2007 in reviewing hospital requirements for improvement and clarification responses.
As of early February, The Joint Commission (formerly JCAHO) had not yet published its 2008 National Patient Safety Goal FAQs, but the rumors from this year's surveyor conference indicate that the term "should" has been somewhat redefined. What I hear is that the term means that the person performing the procedure should do the marking, unless there is some reason why he or she cannot. Many hospitals have interpreted the word using a Webster's-like definition in the belief that it gave them a choice as to whether the person performing the procedure had to be involved in site marking. These hospitals then established internal procedures, for the most part assigning site marking to nursing staff members.
Access the full story in the March issue of Briefings on The Joint Commission. Access is free for BOJ subscribers; nonsubscribers can purchase a copy of the story for $10 by clicking here.
Comments
0 comments on “Universal Protocol: Clarifying the physician’s role ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Nurse posts picture of athlete/patient on Facebook
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Case Management Q&A
- News and briefs: AAMC's president calls residency expansion key to physician shortage problem
- Q/A: Payment for HCPCS code J2354
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Tip of the week: Expand M&M conferences into the program
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Examine RAC audit of acute respiratory failure
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Increase patient satisfaction by improving your discharge process
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- News and briefs: AAMC's president calls residency expansion key to physician shortage problem
- Nurse posts picture of athlete/patient on Facebook
- Tip of the week: Expand M&M conferences into the program
- Searched
