Aligning patients' rights standards with CMS CoPs
Briefings on The Joint Commission, March 1, 2008
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Editor's note: This feature explores problematic Joint Commission standards with expert advice from BOJ advisors. This month's edition is written by Jodi Eisenberg, MHA, CPMSM, CPHQ, program manager of accreditation and clinical compliance at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago. Although the restraint and seclusion standards have been in place for quite some time, a large percentage of hospitals continue to receive RFIs related to one or more of the EPs. With the 2007 revisions to the CMS Conditions of Participation (CoP) for patients' rights, there is no longer alignment between The Joint Commission and CMS. Both requirements are fairly clear in that they outline the rights of all patients. All patients have a right to be free from physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment and free from restraint or seclusion in any form when they are imposed as a means of coercion, discipline, convenience, or retaliation by staff members. The focus of restraints or seclusions should be on the safety of the patient, staff members, and others.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Comments
0 comments on “Aligning patients' rights standards with CMS CoPs ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Nurse posts picture of athlete/patient on Facebook
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Case Management Q&A
- News and briefs: AAMC's president calls residency expansion key to physician shortage problem
- Q/A: Payment for HCPCS code J2354
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Tip of the week: Expand M&M conferences into the program
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- E-mailed
-
- CMS issues IPPS proposed rule for FY 2013
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Examine RAC audit of acute respiratory failure
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- Increase patient satisfaction by improving your discharge process
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- News and briefs: AAMC's president calls residency expansion key to physician shortage problem
- Nurse posts picture of athlete/patient on Facebook
- Tip of the week: Expand M&M conferences into the program
- Searched
